top of page

Ep.15: Racist immaculate purity


Get ready for a journey to the dark side of marketing, where a single word sparked a global scandal. Was it an innocent mistake or a deliberate attempt to exploit harmful stereotypes? In this episode, we unearth a campaign that left a stain that's hard to erase.


An unforgivable mistake

In 2017, the renowned personal care brand Nivea launched a campaign for their new deodorant. The problem arose with the slogan that accompanied the image of a woman wearing a white blouse: "White is Purity."

The brand's intention, according to them, was to highlight that the product did not leave stains on clothing, regardless of its color. However, the message was interpreted as a direct reference to white supremacy and the historical association of the color white with racial purity.


The campaign, launched mainly in the Middle East, quickly went viral, but not for the reasons the brand had hoped. Social media users around the world criticized the ad as racist and offensive, pointing out that it perpetuated harmful stereotypes and promoted discrimination.


Withdrawal and apology

Faced with the avalanche of criticism, Nivea was forced to withdraw the campaign and issue a public apology. In a statement, the brand acknowledged that the ad was "misleading" and that it "did not reflect the values of diversity and inclusion" that it upheld.


Despite the brand's quick reaction, the damage was already done. The "White is purity" campaign became a textbook example of how NOT to do marketing, reminding companies of the importance of considering the cultural and social context when creating their messages. The Nivea campaign was a clear example of how a poor choice of words can have disastrous consequences.


The campaign also highlighted the need for brands to be more aware of the stereotypes and prejudices that they can perpetuate with their messages, especially in an increasingly diverse and interconnected world.


The question for the AI

How would you perceive a marketing campaign for the Middle East market, with a deodorant that uses the slogan "White is purity" next to the image of a woman wearing a white blouse?

The AI's response: The "White is purity" campaign presents a significant risk to the brand's reputation and could generate massive public rejection. The slogan, along with the image of a woman in a white blouse, evokes negative historical associations with white supremacy and racial purity. This is especially problematic in a global and diverse context, where sensitivity to racial issues is high.


Launching this campaign, could be interpreted as an act of cultural insensitivity and disrespect towards diversity. It could alienate a large portion of the potential consumer base and damage the brand's image in the long term.


Instead of focusing on whiteness as synonymous with purity, the campaign could highlight the product's benefits more inclusively and respectfully. For example, it could emphasize how the deodorant prevents stains on clothes of all colors, thus promoting a message of diversity and acceptance.


Furthermore, the campaign could take the opportunity to address issues of sustainability and social responsibility, showing the brand's commitment to a greener and more equitable future. This could include the use of natural ingredients, recyclable packaging, and sustainable production practices.


By adopting a more ethical and responsible approach, the brand would not only avoid a public relations disaster but could also generate a positive impact on society and strengthen its connection with consumers.s.


A Predictive Revenue Marketing proposal

This example is for educational purposes and aims to illustrate how Nivea could utilize Predictive Revenue Marketing. It's important to note that, in a real-world scenario, thorough market research and careful consideration of the ethical implications of data usage and algorithms would be required.

  • Objective: Nivea's primary objective would be to increase sales revenue for its new deodorant, avoiding controversies and ensuring the message resonates positively with a diverse global audience.

  • Strategy used:

    • Predictive analysis: Nivea could create multiple slogan options and campaign concepts. Then, it would employ predictive analysis to assess the potential performance of each option in terms of revenue, taking into account demographics, interests, purchase history, and expected emotional responses.

    • Revenue attribution: Nivea would implement revenue attribution models to understand which marketing channels (social media, online advertising, influencers, etc.) contribute most to sales and adjust advertising investment accordingly.

    • Conversion analysis: Nivea would carefully track and analyze conversion rates at each stage of the sales funnel, from ad viewing to final purchase, to identify areas for improvement and optimize the customer experience.

  • Measuring success:

    • Return on Investment (ROI): Compare revenue generated with marketing investment to assess campaign efficiency.

    • Conversion rate: Measure the percentage of people who saw the ad and ultimately purchased the product.

    • Customer Lifetime Value (CLTV): Estimate the total value a customer will generate for Nivea throughout their relationship with the brand.

    • Brand sentiment: Monitor online conversations and product reviews to assess the overall perception of the Nivea brand.

  • Important note: It's crucial for Nivea to address ethical concerns regarding data usage, privacy, and potential biases in algorithms. By addressing these ethical concerns, Nivea can build trust with its customers and ensure that its predictive revenue marketing strategy is sustainable and responsible in the long term. This involves:

    • Transparency: Being transparent about how customer data is collected and used.

    • Consent: Obtaining informed consent from users before collecting their data.

    • Fairness: Ensuring that algorithms do not perpetuate discriminatory biases.

    • Privacy: Protecting the privacy of customer data and complying with data protection regulations.

Comments


bottom of page